|
Northampton United Methodist Church Council
Minutes of Regular Meeting Held at 8:00 am on October 13, 2007
The Chair, Don Cooper, declared a quorum and called the
meeting to order.
The meeting was opened with prayer by Stan Rittgers.
Members present: Dave Scavuzzo, Stan Rittgers, Kim Lint,
Brett Bartels, Karen Hilderbrand, Don Cooper, Steve Yashnik, Dave Waldron, Cindy
Patterson, Sonia Kern, Noreen Evans, Pat Davis.
Pat Davis and Kim Lint graciously consented to work
together to take the minutes of the meeting.
Dave Scavuzzo announced that an anonymous gift of $1,000
had been given for the café (Re-Vision).
Karen Hilderbrand, Finance chair, noted that presently we
are $31,000 under budget compared to last year at this time when we were $10,000
behind.
Unfinished Business
Re-Vision:
Discussion of the Re-Vision project and the commitment
letter mailed to Church Council members by Dave Waldron in July. Responses: two
handwritten notes returned and seven completed forms returned. Everyone who
attended the July meeting but did not respond to the letter was called by Don
Cooper (along with ten other church leaders). Verbally, $12,500 has been
committed by Church Council members (six giving units). Five Church Council
members committed to raising funds for the project through a rummage sale and a
couple of members stated they had all ready given (some twice) for this project.
Overall, Church Council members say they are committed to this project and the
average commitment level of Church Council members (on a scale of 1 to 10) is
seven. One person said she was not for the project but has changed her mind.
Several stated that they were unable to commit funds (e.g., "gave to RFKC,"
"too many other commitments," "I have kids in college which is
stretching our budget," "already giving [generously] to the
church," "our extra mile giving is maxed out").
A discussion of the Re-Vision project included these
questions/comments:
1. Is the group committed enough to follow through
with this project? It was agreed that the commitment of the leaders will reflect
the commitment of the congregation. The consensus was (again) that the leaders
are committed, we are extraordinarily blessed, we are called to spread the good
news (and our "DNA"), and that God is at work here. Now the challenge
is to communicate the vision to the congregation.
2. Do we really need a place to get coffee in the
church? It was agreed that this is not the reason or the vision for the café.
Outreach is the reason.
3. Who will move tables and chairs around the new
café? The current model being pursued for the café is one of it being run like
a business. One or more employees will manage the facility with support, as
needed, from volunteers from the church. Employing church youth was mentioned as
was hiring one person to oversee (manage) the business and facility.
4. Where is the passion for this project? The
consensus is that once the true vision for this project for outreach and
bringing people to Christ is properly communicated to the congregation,
excitement and passion will follow. Clearly, the full vision and purpose of the
project has yet to be effectively communicated to the congregation.
5. What is the vision of the project? The café will
be used as a meeting place for small groups, a safe meeting place for youth, a
"demilitarized zone" for the unchurched, and a comfortable place for
interested people to ask questions and build a bridge to the church. The world
is not comfortable with the present image of the church, and we are called to go
to the world in their place of comfort.
6. How do we best illustrate both the "bricks
and mortar" side and the ministry side of the project to the congregation?
The consensus was to continue to (and more effectively and thoroughly)
communicate the vision of the project from the pulpit and during worship, have
members of Church Council discuss and share their passion for the project with
their respective small groups, and ask all church leaders to look for
opportunities to answer questions and pass the true vision of the project onto
members of the congregation.
A discussion was held regarding the type of person it will
take to lead this project to fruition. It was agreed that one person should lead
the "charge" and that it will take a person with a passion (vision)
for outreach ministry who understands project management and what it takes to
get a project like this done. In fact, it may take two people: one to lead the
ministry end of the project and another to lead the facility/business management
end of the project. As was agreed on previous projects at NUMC, it usually takes
one type of person to lead the planning of such a project and another type of
person to manage the details of the construction of the project (manage,
negotiate, pay bills, etc).
The benefits of having a separate entrance and clear
signage were discussed. This would make it easier for the unchurched to visit
and would more closely resemble the environment that has become so enticing and
comfortable to the world.
The importance of having both a business plan (with
specific financial, equipment, and personnel issues addressed) as well as a
ministry plan was discussed.
Cindy Patterson made a motion, which was properly
seconded, to have a task group develop both a business and ministry plan that
includes identifying a person to lead the project and a financial cap for
getting all this done. The motion passed by unanimous oral vote. Discussion on
this issue included the fact that the person for this position was not required
to be from the church, but a member of NUMC was preferred.
The Chair (Don Cooper) directed that a Task Group be
organized to address this motion. Members of the Task Group include Don Cooper,
Terri Sunderland, Sonia Kern, Karen Hilderbrand, and Dave Scavuzzo. The mission
of this group is to recommend a person to fulfill previous motion and
investigate methods of developing a business/ministry plan for the project.
Stewardship:
Karen Hilderbrand will be speaking to the congregation
regarding stewardship and the "state of union." John Wheaton and
Karolyn Dunlop will speak regarding ministry to people outside (internal and
external to the church), and Sonia Kern will discuss the café ministry.
Pledge cards will be requested on November 18th & 25th
and go in a box on the altar. The cards will be reviewed only for a ball park
figures.
The use of gift annuities was discussed briefly thinking
that they might be useful to our congregation. Contacting Brian Ray was thought
to be the best path to learn more about these.
New Business
All leaders were encouraged to visit small groups, share
the café vision, and get feedback about the project.
Reach will be held the week of July 6, 2008 (Sunday
through Saturday; setup the week before). A steering committee is in place.
Contact Cindy Patterson for more info.
Having no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:20
am.
The next Church Council meeting is scheduled for Saturday
November 10, 2007, at 8:00 am.
Respectfully submitted,
Pat Davis
Position
Represented
(voting members) |
Name |
| Church
Council Chair |
Don
Cooper |
| Lay
Leader/Directions Chair |
Terri
Sunderland |
| Nurturing
Coordinator |
Cindy
Patterson |
| Age
Level & Family |
Brett
Bartels |
| Finance
Chair |
Karen
Hilderbrand |
| Trustee
Representative |
Ben
Leipold |
| Members
at Large |
Sharon Carr
Bryan Howdyshell
Sonia Kern
Jill Tulloss
Dave Waldron
Noreen
Evans
Pat Davis |
| SPR
Chair |
Monte
Morgan/Tom Patterson |
| Adult
Ministry Coordinator |
Stan
Rittgers |
| Women’s
Ministry Representative |
Stephanie
Walk |
| Men’s
Ministry Representative |
Steve
Yashnik |
| Youth
Ministry Representative |
Corrie
Lint |
Position
Represented
(non-voting members) |
Name |
| Pastoral
Staff |
Dave
Scavuzzo
Paul Sunderland |
| Communications
Director |
Kim
Lint |
Lay
Members of
Annual Conference |
Korky
Davis
Carol Golby |
|